MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755418634 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.115111

Two-stage multipolar ordering in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Pr</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Al</mml:mi><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> Kondo materials

2018· article· lv· W2755418634 on OpenAlexafffund
Frederic Freyer, Jan Attig, SungBin Lee, Arun Paramekanti, Simon Trebst, Yong Baek Kim

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa BarbaraKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyNational Research Foundation of KoreaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhase diagramFermi liquid theoryIntermetallicCondensed matter physicsPhysicsSpin (aerodynamics)SuperconductivityPhase (matter)Materials scienceThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among heavy fermion materials, there is a set of rare-earth intermetallics with non-Kramers ${\mathrm{Pr}}^{3+}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}4{f}^{2}$ moments which exhibit a rich phase diagram with intertwined quadrupolar orders, superconductivity, and non-Fermi liquid behavior. However, more subtle broken symmetries such as multipolar orders in these Kondo materials remain poorly studied. Here, we argue that multi-spin interactions between local moments beyond the conventional two-spin exchange must play an important role in Kondo materials near the ordered to heavy Fermi liquid transition. We show that this drives a plethora of phases with coexisting multipolar orders and multiple thermal phase transitions, providing a natural framework for interpreting experiments on the Pr(${T)}_{2}{\mathrm{Al}}_{20}$ class of compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3800.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207