MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755434175 · doi:10.46298/dmtcs.2512

Fan realizations of type $A$ subword complexes and multi-associahedra of rank 3

2015· article· en· W2755434175 on OpenAlexafffund
Nantel Bergeron, Cesar Ceballos, Jean‐Philippe Labbé

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsFields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences
FundersYork UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsCombinatoricsType (biology)Coxeter groupRank (graph theory)Simplicial complexRegular polygonMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present complete simplicial fan realizations of any spherical subword complex of type $A_n$ for $n\leq 3$. This provides complete simplicial fan realizations of simplicial multi-associahedra $\Delta_{2k+4,k}$, whose facets are in correspondence with $k$-triangulations of a convex $(2k+4)$-gon. This solves the first open case of the problem of finding fan realizations where polytopality is not known. The techniques presented in this paper work for all finite Coxeter groups and we hope that they will be useful to construct fans realizing subword complexes in general. In particular, we present fan realizations of two previously unknown cases of subword complexes of type $A_4$, namely the multi-associahedra $\Delta_{9,2}$ and $\Delta_{11,3}$. Nous construisons des éventails simpliciaux complets ayant la combinatoire des complexes de sous-mots de type $A_n$ pour $n\leq 3$. Par conséquent, nous obtenons des constructions d’éventails des multi-associaèdres $\Delta_{2k+4,k}$, dont les facettes correspondent aux $k$-triangulations d’un $(2k+4)$-gone. Cette construction confirme l’existence d’éventails ayant la combinatoire du multi-associaèdres pour une famille dont la polytopalité n’est pas confirmée. Les techniques utilisées fonctionnent pour tous les groupes de Coxeter et nous espérons qu’elles seront utiles afin de construire des éventails réalisant les complexes de sous-mots en général. En particulier, nous présentons des éventails pour deux complexes de sous-mots de type $A_4$ dont l’existence était inconnue: les multi-associaèdres $\Delta_{9,2}$ et $\Delta_{11,3}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer ScienceSame topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207