MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755436382 · doi:10.21659/rupkatha.v2n3.06

“Hijos de la madre chingada” or New Mestiza: Paz and Anzaldúa

2010· article· es· W2755436382 on OpenAlexaff
Danielle Lamb

Bibliographic record

VenueRupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaEthnogenesisIdentity (music)SociologyHumanitiesGender studiesArtAnthropologyAestheticsEthnic group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores Chicano/a identity through the seminal work of Octavio Paz and Gloria Anzalda. Paz and Anzalda draw from a common ethnogenesis and the figure of La Malinche. However, Anzalda not only challenges Paz's view on identity but also provides an alternative to his highly gendered theories of the Mexican diaspora.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in HumanitiesSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207