MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755660258 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1708914114

Clonal expansion and epigenetic reprogramming following deletion or amplification of mutant <i>IDH1</i>

2017· article· en· W2755660258 on OpenAlexaff
Tali Mazor, Charles Chesnelong, Aleksandr Pankov, Llewellyn E. Jalbert, Chibo Hong, Josie Hayes, Ivan Smirnov, Roxanne Marshall, Camila Ferreira de Souza, Yaoqing Shen, Pavithra Viswanath, Houtan Noushmehr, Sabrina M. Ronen, Steven J.M. Jones, Marco A. Marra, J. Gregory Cairncross, Arie Perry, Sarah J. Nelson, Susan M. Chang, Andrew W. Bollen, Annette M. Molinaro, Henrik Bengtsson, Adam B. Olshen, Samuel Weiss, Joanna J. Phillips, H. Artee Luchman, J Costello

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsIDH1ReprogrammingEpigenomeEpigeneticsMutantCarcinogenesisBiologyCancer researchMutationGeneticsCancerDNA methylationGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Identifying the drivers of tumorigenesis provides insight into mechanisms of transformation and can suggest novel therapeutic targets. IDH1 mutations in gliomas are one such promising target. Drivers of tumor initiation may be distinct from those at tumor recurrence, however. Here, we demonstrate that in a subset of initially IDH1 mutant gliomas IDH1 is deleted or amplified at recurrence, yielding a higher grade tumor with a reprogrammed epigenome. We also report systematic selection for cells with IDH1 CNA in vitro and in vivo. Thus, while IDH1 mutation likely initiates gliomagenesis, neither mutant IDH1 nor the oncometabolite 2HG that it produces are required at recurrence. These findings have important implications for emerging therapeutic strategies targeting mutant IDH1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations140
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207