MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755694817

Чинники залучення батьків гомосексуальних дітей до ЛГБТ-руху в Україні

2016· article· uk· W2755694817 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tamara Martsenyuk, В. Колеснік

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Institutional Repository (National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Sexual Relationships
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although, compared to the previous century, the attitudes of many democratic societies to the LGBT
\ncommunity has become more tolerant, the problem of homophobia is still relevant in the world. This is one
\nof the reasons why parents stand together in groups in defense of their LGBT children to change this attitude
\nand support of other mothers and fathers.
\nCurrently in many Western countries the movement of parents of homosexual children, actively operates,
\noften on the national level. Among the largest and most famous NGOs are Parents and Friends of Lesbians
\nand Gays (PFLAG) in the USA, PFLAG Canada, FFLAG (Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays) in
\nGreat Britain, AGEDO (Associazione genitori, parenti e amici di omosessuali) in Italy, BEFAH
\n(Bundesverband der Eltern, Freunde und Angehörige von Homosexuellen) in Germany, AMPGIL in Spain,
\nand many others. In the post-soviet countries its institutionalization only begins. For example, organisations
\nof parents of homosexual children exist in Ukraine, Russia, and Moldova. Obviously, the movement of
\nparents of LGBT children faces similar challenges as the international one, necessitating its careful
\nexamination.
\nThe empirical basis of this article includes semi-structured interviews with seven mothers of gays and
\nlesbians from different cities of Ukraine, who belong to NGO “Tergo”. During the field research period
\n(February-March 2015) there were any male members in this NGO.
\nBased on the review of previous studies and their own research, the authors have identified the factors
\nof involvement of parents of homosexual children into the LGBT movement in Ukraine. It is necessary to
\ndistinguish two types of factors: factors related to satisfaction of their own needs and factors related to
\nhelping others. The first category includes the need for support and assistance and the need for knowledge;
\nthe second focuses on the support and the desire to protect their children, the need to provide assistance and
\nsupport to other children, support of other parents, and the need to express opinions and needs of the LGBT
\ncommunity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Institutional Repository (National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy)Same topicMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsFrench-language works237,207