MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755739663 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707021114

Samd7 is a cell type-specific PRC1 component essential for establishing retinal rod photoreceptor identity

2017· article· en· W2755739663 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yoshihiro Omori, Shun Kubo, Tetsuo Kon, Mayu Furuhashi, Hirotaka Narita, Taro Kominami, Akiko Ueno, Ryotaro Tsutsumi, Taro Chaya, Haruka Yamamoto, Isao Suetake, Shinji Ueno, Haruhiko Koseki, Atsushi Nakagawa, Takahisa Furukawa

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyTakeda Science FoundationSumitomo FoundationKanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical ScienceJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyInstitute for Protein Research, Osaka UniversitySenri Life Science Foundation
KeywordsComponent (thermodynamics)Identity (music)RetinalCell biologyNeuroscienceBiologyArtPhysicsAestheticsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Each retinal rod and cone photoreceptor cell subtype expresses a distinct set of genes including the genes encoding phototransduction components such as opsins and transducins. This subtype-specific gene expression is essential for achieving proper function in each photoreceptor cell. While the various cone and rod photoreceptor cell gene expressions are regulated by multiple transcription factors, whether epigenetic regulation plays an important role for photoreceptor cell-specific gene expression has been unclear. In the current study, we found that a photoreceptor-specific protein, Samd7, functions as a component of the epigenetic gene-silencing complex and is essential for establishing rod photoreceptor cell identity and function by silencing nonrod gene expression in developing rod photoreceptor cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207