MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755794039 · doi:10.14288/1.0355214

Supporting the implementation of effective urban water conservation and demand management strategies

2017· article· en· W2755794039 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Klein

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental planningWater conservationBusinessDemand managementEnvironmental resource managementWater resourcesEnvironmental scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an urgent need to ensure the sustainability of urban water resources. In the face of growing challenges including urbanization, climate change, and increased competition for available resources, new and innovative water management strategies are required. The conventional approach to sustainable urban water management typically focusses on the supply dimension; however, this has proven to be largely inadequate and many are calling for a new approach to addressing this issue. The aim of this thesis is to examine how the water meter data management and analysis systems might be improved to better support water conservation efforts by exploring the literature and carrying out a case study of the City of Vancouver. Literature covering the field of urban water demand modeling as well as conservation interventions and their use in reducing potable water demand were reviewed within the context of the changing understanding of urban water resource sustainability and its dimensions. A case study of the City of Vancouver parks system then explored how existing water meter data could be leveraged to support conservation efforts. The results found that while there have been substantial efforts undertaken to characterize and understand the factors that influence water demand, behaviour and social factors remain largely unaccounted for which are vital dimensions to include in the development of solutions. The case study findings demonstrated that the analysis of existing data can be successful in understanding conservation strategy options, which can be a useful entry point in addressing this highly complex problem. Across the literature and case study the findings highlight the gap in knowledge around water use and behaviour that is evident when the focus is on sustainability. Future work is recommended to incorporate a wide range of influencing factors that go beyond the conventional supply oriented paradigm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207