Computationally relevant generalized derivatives: theory, evaluation and applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new method for evaluating generalized derivatives in nonsmooth problems is reviewed. Lexicographic directional (LD-)derivatives are a recently developed tool in nonsmooth analysis for evaluating generalized derivative elements in a tractable and robust way. Applicable to problems in both steady-state and dynamic settings, LD-derivatives exhibit a number of advantages over current theory and algorithms. As highlighted in this article, the LD-derivative approach now admits a suitable theory for inverse and implicit functions, nonsmooth dynamical systems and optimization problems, among others. Moreover, this technique includes an extension of the standard vector forward mode of automatic differentiation (AD) and acts as the natural extension of classical calculus results to the nonsmooth case in many ways. The theory of LD-derivatives is placed in the context of state-of-the-art methods in nonsmooth analysis, with an application in multistream heat exchanger modelling and design used to illustrate the usefulness of the approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it