Une leçon de soft power : le rôle des coopérations états-uniennes avec la Chine dans l’exportation de l’enseignement de la gestion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse le rôle des coopérations états-uniennes dans l’émergence et la structuration de l’enseignement de la gestion en Chine depuis le début du xxe siècle. Des coopérations successives menées par plusieurs acteurs états-uniens (évangélisation, puis endiguement du communisme, et enfin aide au développement économique) ont porté des projets visant à aider au développement de la Chine. Avec des objectifs et des approches différentes, ils ont utilisé l’enseignement de la gestion comme un outil de chacun de leurs projets. En dépit des décennies de communisme maoïste, ce processus a conduit à l’exportation d’un modèle états-unien d’enseignement de la gestion d’entreprise qui domine aujourd’hui en République populaire de Chine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".