Connectivity-Aware Task Outsourcing and Scheduling in D2D Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the flourishing of smart mobile devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets), development of mobile cloud computing has received more and more attentions from both industry and academia. Compared with the traditional way of executing large- scale computational tasks on powerful desktop computers and the cloud, mobile cloud computing is featured by the ubiquitous availability, flexibility, and low-cost. However, this feature also brings challenges when we build the satisfactory mobile computing system. First, the computational power on a mobile device is not comparable with that on a personal computer such that many computation-intensive tasks cannot be independently handled by mobile devices. Second, offloading computational tasks to the cloud introduces additional monetary costs (e.g. wireless communication cost, computational service cost), which may be pricy for users. In this paper, we propose a novel connectivity- aware task scheduling paradigm to enable mobile device users to accomplish computation-intensive tasks cooperatively in the device-to-device (D2D) network by incorporating the "fog" - aggregate of computational powers in the ad-hoc. A supernode at the base station is responsible for scheduling cooperation tasks based on user mobility. To further enhance the quality of experience (QoE) for the users, we propose a lightweight heuristic algorithm to perform task scheduling to ensure low cooperative task execution time. Simulation results show that our cooperative paradigm efficiently reduces the average task execution time for mobile device users in the D2D network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".