MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Army in the Woods: Spruce Production Division Records at the National Archives

2011· article· en· W2756148155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathleen Crosman

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDivision (mathematics)Production (economics)ForestryDatabaseArchaeologyGeographyComputer scienceArithmeticMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kathleen Crosman of the National Archives at Seattle introduces readers to the possibilities of doing genealogy research in the records of the Spruce Production Division. During World War I, troops were based in the forests and mills of the Pacific Northwest, and the National Archives at Seattle has the correspondence of 150 field squadrons and companies, district offices, and the headquarters cantonment at the Vancouver Barracks in Vancouver, Washington. Crosman outlines possible search routes and describes the type of information that is available in the squadron and headquarters correspondence. The squadron correspondence tells a story of the soldiers' lives — their pay, their complaints, their requests, the routines of military operations even in the middle of the forest, and the semi-civilian feel of a military unit in which most soldiers were working on civilian tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOregon Historical QuarterlySame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207