MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756178437 · doi:10.22215/cjcr.v1i1.31

Article 19 of the CRC and the Criminal Justice System's Duty to Protect Children against Violence

2014· article· en· W2756178437 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yvon Dandurand

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
FundersUniversity of Cape Town
KeywordsCriminal justiceDutyConvention on the Rights of the ChildPolitical scienceCriminologyEconomic JusticeLawConventionPsychologyHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United Nations General Assembly will soon adopt a new instrument to help prevent violence against children: the United Nations Model Strategies and Practical Measures on the Elimination of Violence against Children in the Field of Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice. The new instrument should help States give full effect to Article 19 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. It is an important tool because it is the first international instrument to articulate the responsibility of the criminal justice system, in cooperation with child protection and other agencies, to prevent and respond to violence against children. The instrument aims to improve the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in preventing, prohibiting and responding to all forms of violence against children, as well as preventing any violence against children which may occur during their contacts with that system. The article introduces the new instrument, describes its main features and relates them to several of the difficult challenges every society faces in preventing violence against children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0140.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfantsSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207