MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756243586 · doi:10.1177/2325957417718624

Chest Deformity and Disability due to Tenofovir-Induced Hypophosphatemic Osteomalacia: Case Report and Call for Improved Global Access to Laboratory Testing

2017· article· en· W2756243586 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Hájek, Simple Ouma, Juliya Hemmett, Rob Starko, Paska Apiyo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsRoyal Columbian HospitalWestern UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteomalaciaHypophosphatemiaMedicineUrinalysisTenofovirInternal medicineTubulopathyGastroenterologyOsteoporosisHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Kidney diseaseSurgeryImmunologyUrinary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Millions of people worldwide take tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis B infection. Although generally safe and well tolerated, clinicians need to be aware that TDF can cause proximal renal tubular dysfunction and loss of bone mineral density, especially in patients with concomitant renal disease or other risk factors. We present the case of a patient with chronic HIV infection and urethral stricture who developed TDF-related proximal renal tubular dysfunction with hypophosphatemia and osteomalacia, presenting with bone pains, skeletal deformity, and disability. We review risk factors for TDF-related renal tubular toxicity and recommendations for monitoring creatinine, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and urinalysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)Same topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207