MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756299746 · doi:10.1142/s1793042118500446

A unifying look at zero-sum invariants

2017· article· en· W2756299746 on OpenAlex
Weidong Gao, Yuanlin Li, Jiangtao Peng, Guoqing Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Number Theory · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaScience and Technology Development FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsZero (linguistics)SubsequenceCombinatoricsInteger (computer science)Abelian groupSequence (biology)Discrete mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the paper is to provide a unified way to formulate zero-sum invariants. Let [Formula: see text] be a finite additive abelian group. Let [Formula: see text] denote the monoid of all zero-sum sequences over [Formula: see text]. For [Formula: see text], let [Formula: see text] be the smallest integer [Formula: see text] such that every sequence [Formula: see text] over [Formula: see text] of length [Formula: see text] has a subsequence in [Formula: see text]. We provide some first results and open problems on [Formula: see text].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it