MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756397021 · doi:10.1002/cepa.328

10.31: Simplified analytical determination of the temperature distribution and the load bearing resistance of slim‐floor beams

2017· article· en· W2756397021 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuece/papers · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlabThermal conductionHeat fluxStructural engineeringBearing (navigation)USableTransient (computer programming)MechanicsBeam (structure)Materials scienceEngineeringHeat transferComputer sciencePhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This contribution presents an analytical method to determine the distribution of temperature within a steel section integrated into a concrete slab, which is subjected to a time‐dependent heat flux. The method developed is based on an analytical solution of the general heat equation for transient conduction simplified to be usable for the calculation of the load bearing resistance of the slim‐floor beam. This simplified analytical solution is validated by comparison against results obtained from numerical simulations. A possible extension of the developed method to fire protected sections is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it