Organic‐walled microfossils from the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary stratotype section, Chapel Island and Random formations, Burin Peninsula, Newfoundland, Canada: Global correlation and significance for the evolution of early complex ecosystems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although a variety of trace and body fossils have been described from the Cambrian strata in the stratotype section (global stratotype section and point) of the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary in the Burin Peninsula, Newfoundland, a detailed analysis of its organic‐walled microfossils has been missing. The basal CambrianTreptichnus pedumIchnozone of the Chapel Island Formation is dominated by leiosphaerids and filamentous sheaths. The appearance ofGranomarginataapproximates the base of the overlyingRusophycus avalonensisIchnozone. Common process‐bearing acritarchs, represented by smallAsteridiumandComasphaeridium, first appear in the middle of the overlying Random Formation, and a more diverse acritarch assemblage at its top. The Random Formation also yields small carbonaceous metazoan fossils, the first report of this type of fossil in this formation. The initial low diversity of phytoplankton in the basal Cambrian strata, a holdover from Ediacaran extinctions, indicated that they have limited potential for precise global correlation of the global stratotype section and point. The pattern of increasing diversity of acritarchs through the lower Fortunian strata lagged behind and was potentially a response to the Cambrian radiation of metazoans, as most clearly represented by ichnofossils. The timing of phytoplankton radiation reflects a dynamic lag driven by metazoan‐induced changes in early Cambrian food webs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".