MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756475928 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.336

Comparison of individual and microgrid approaches for a distributed multi energy system with different renewable shares in the grid electricity supply

2017· article· en· W2756475928 on OpenAlex
Boran Morvaj, Ralph Evins, Jan Carmeliet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridRenewable energyDistributed generationEnvironmental economicsGridEnergy supplyEnergy engineeringElectricityElectricity systemIntermittent energy sourceMains electricitySustainable energyComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Electricity generationEngineeringPower (physics)EconomicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition to 100% renewable energy systems is an important factor in the transition to sustainable energy systems. A top-down approach is often used to study the design of such energy systems on a country or continental scale. Results of these studies are useful for developing energy roadmaps but they lack the details about how distributed multi energy systems should be designed and operated at local level. An optimisation model of distributed multi energy systems is applied in order to investigate how urban districts should be optimally designed in the (near) future when the goals of energy roadmaps are achieved. The impact of individual and microgrid approaches on distributed multi energy systems is analysed on an urban district level for scenarios with different levels of renewable energy in the electricity grid supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it