MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756506909

Medical Care Reminder for Infants Using Android Application

2017· article· en· W2756506909 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulrahman Alkandari, Dana Aladem, Somaia Asaad, Samer Moein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet privacyAndroid (operating system)ScheduleHealth careComputer scienceAndroid applicationWork scheduleDutyMedical emergencyComputer securityMedicineWork (physics)Engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, smartphones become the language of communication and have great importance because they provide applications to facilitate people's work, save time and effort. Smartphones provide the user with reminders through the available applications. A lot of people suffer from health issues. Working people always have a busy schedule, and today's life is full of responsibilities and stress. This makes people more prone to different kinds of diseases. Our duty is to make ourselves stay fit and healthy. Healthy Reminder Application is designed to solve these problems. It can be very helpful as a reminder to take medications on time, dosages, and vaccination dates as an example, and it can spread health care awareness. Medical reminder helps in decreasing medication, Reducing errors and wrong dosage. In this paper, the Healthy Reminder Application is introduced and it plays an important part in our daily lives that help people staying fit and healthy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.427 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced Computer Science and TechnologySame topicMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207