MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2756748596 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2017-0215

Landscape-scale regulators of water transparency in mountain lakes: implications of projected glacial loss

2017· article· en· W2756748596 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Mark H. Olson, Janet M. Fischer, Craig E. Williamson, Erin P. Overholt, Nora Theodore

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of MiamiParks CanadaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsColored dissolved organic matterTurbidityEnvironmental scienceAbsorbanceGlacierHydrology (agriculture)Dissolved organic carbonPhotosynthetically active radiationWater columnDrainage basinOceanographyGeologyEcologyNutrientGeomorphologyChemistryGeographyPhytoplanktonBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined factors regulating water transparency in a set of 33 lakes located in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Eighteen lakes had catchments that included glaciers and 15 did not. In each lake, we quantified midsummer attenuation rates for three ultraviolet wavelengths and photosynthetically active radiation and measured chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) absorbance, turbidity, and chlorophyll a fluorescence. We also used GIS to quantify characteristics of lake catchments. Across lakes, turbidity and CDOM absorbance were arrayed on orthogonal gradients that intersected in a region of low turbidity and low CDOM absorbance. Nonglacially fed lakes had low turbidity and attenuation rates were regulated by CDOM absorbance, which increased with the percentage of the catchment covered by vegetation. Glacially fed lakes had low CDOM absorbance and attenuation rates increased with turbidity, which increased with the percentage of the catchment covered by permanent ice. Glaciers are retreating rapidly in the Canadian Rockies. As catchments become deglaciated, turbidity will likely decrease and the regulator of lake transparency is likely to switch to CDOM, which will have broad implications for lake ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→