MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756867501 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.843

Antibiotic Prescription Practice for Pediatric Urinary Tract Infection in a Tertiary Center

2017· article· en· W2756867501 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Alghounaim, Olivia Ostrow, Kathryn Timberlake, Susan E. Richardson, Michelle Science

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrinalysisAntibioticsLeukocyte esteraseUrinePyuriaMedical prescriptionUrinary systemPediatricsGenitourinary systemEmergency departmentInternal medicineAntimicrobial stewardshipAzithromycinAntibiotic resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a leading cause for acute care visits in pediatrics. A suspected UTI diagnosis is made based on typical clinical presentation and pyuria and confirmed by significant growth in an appropriate urine sample. Prescribing antibiotics for suspected UTI is a common practice, and may lead to unnecessary antibiotic exposure. We aimed to review the practice of UTI diagnosis and management in the Emergency Department (ED) to identify targets to improve antimicrobial prescribing practices. Methods Children (< 18 years) who were discharged from the ED at the Hospital for Sick Children with a diagnosis of UTI between October to December 2016 were included. Patients were excluded if they were (1) under 12 weeks of age, (2) had underlying genitourinary abnormalities, (3) were admitted or transferred to another center, (4) were on antibiotics on presentation, (5) had urine testing done in another laboratory, or (6) were given conditional prescription. Demographic, clinical history, laboratory findings, and urine culture results were collected from patient charts. The sensitivity and specificity of nitrite and leukocyte esterase (LE) for UTI diagnosis were calculated. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between urinalysis characteristics and confirmed UTI. Results A total of 186 children with a median age of 4.2 (IQR 1.2, 7.3) were included; 82.3% were female. Almost all children were discharged home on antibiotics (n = 183, 98%) for a median duration of 7 days (IQR 7, 10). A total of 87 patients (46.8%) received antibiotics despite negative urine cultures and none of these patients received notification to stop. This led to 652 unnecessary antibiotic days. The presence of nitrites was the strongest predictor of UTI (OR 13.3, P < 0.001) and was highly specific. An LE result of 2+ (OR 2.4, P = 0.04) or 3+ (OR 2.23, P = 0.016) was also predictive of UTI. Conclusion Current practice in managing suspected pediatric UTIs in our ED resulted in significant and unnecessary antibiotic exposure. We identified targets to reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure including improving the diagnostic accuracy of UTIs, a process to discontinue antibiotics for negative cultures and standardizing antimicrobial duration. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207