MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756913085 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2017.8050745

Analog layout density uniformity improvement using interconnect widening and dummy fill insertion

2017· article· en· W2756913085 on OpenAlexaff
Gholamreza Shomalnasab, Lihong Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterconnectionComputer scienceIntegrated circuit layoutConstraint (computer-aided design)IC layout editorProcess (computing)GraphScheme (mathematics)Electronic engineeringEngineering drawingIntegrated circuitCircuit extractionEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceMechanical engineeringVoltageEquivalent circuitTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conventional dummy fill insertion operation is usually conducted by foundries without taking into account circuit performance. In this paper, we propose a graph-based scheme to first modify layout interconnect geometry to improve pattern density uniformity in the analog layouts before the traditional dummy fill insertion process as an optional stage. The original analog constraints can be still preserved thanks to the mechanism of the constraint graphs used to represent the analog layouts. The experimental results show that our proposed method can improve pattern density uniformity by up to 75% for the regular analog layouts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207