MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756988443

5. A ocorrência de alexitimia entre pacientes renais em tratamento dialítico

2017· article· pt· W2756988443 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Maria Feliciano Silva, Débora Pastore Bassitt, Kátia da Silva Wanderley

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Científica UMC · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChronic renal failurePsychosocialPopulationChronic kidney failureGynecologyHemodialysisHumanitiesInternal medicinePsychiatryPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A insuficiencia renal cronica consiste na perda gradativa e progressiva das funcoes dos rins, o que pode repercutir em restricoes e causar impacto psicossocial no individuo. A alexitimia e um constructo caracterizado pela dificuldade que o individuo apresenta em identificar e expressar a emocao. O presente estudo avaliou a presenca de alexitimia no paciente com lesao renal cronica dialitica. E tambem analisou a adequacao das suas respostas a TAS-20 para a populacao estudada. Trata-se de um estudo transversal de abordagem quantitativa, realizado no periodo de marco a abril de 2012, com uma amostra com 20 pacientes de ambos os sexos atendidos em um servico de dialise na cidade de Sao Paulo. A avaliacao foi realizada com a versao em Portugues da Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto. O estudo mostrou que 45% dos individuos com escore ≥ 61 apresentam alexitimia e que o instrumento utilizado e adequado para a populacao pesquisada. Palavras-chave: Alexitimia; Insuficiencia Renal Cronica; Dialise; Disturbios Emocionais. Abstract : Chronic renal failure is the gradual and progressive loss of kidney function, which may be reflected in restrictions and psychosocial impact on the individual. The alexithymia construct is one characterized by difficulty the individual features to identify and express emotion. The present study evaluated the presence of alexithymia in patients with chronic renal lesion dialytic. And also reviewed the adequacy of their answers to the TAS-20 for the study population. This is a cross-sectional study of a quantitative approach, carried out in the period from March to April 2012, with a sample with 20 patients of both sexes met in a dialysis service in the city of Sao Paulo. The evaluation was carried out with the Portuguese version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. The study showed that 45% of individuals with score ≥ 61 feature alexithymia and the instrument used is suitable for the population under study. Key words: Alexithymia; Chronic Kidney Failure; Dialysis; Emotional Disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Científica UMCSame topicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207