Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although today it is the appearance of Jakarta Kota (formerly known as Batavia) that is most appealing to the general public, the problems and issues concerning this quarter of Greater Jakarta centre on the loss of socio-economic functionality, rather than the dilapidation of the building stock. Jakarta Kota is eroding from a lively colonial trading town (with the full range of economic and administrative functions) into what is now a quarter where the historic scenery is gradually fading. Based as it is, on sophisticated, classical European town planning and architecture, it has today hardly any reference to contemporary Indonesian society. One should keep this in mind when preparing a conservation scheme for Jakarta Kota. Without a feasible social and economic vision for the future functioning of Kota within a (much) greater Jakarta, every action in the field of (integrated) conservation is bound to fail and will certainly not encourage private investors to participate. An association of Indonesian business people, coming together in a body called 'Jakarta old town, KotaKu' intends to put a halt to the decay by revitalising this part of the town and conserving its specific urban and architectural features. Through ICOMOS, experts from the Netherlands were requested to provide technical support for this project. This paper outlines the nature of the project and of this international support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".