Population change and external commuting in Canada's rural and small town municipalities: 1996-2001
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstracts C.J.A. MITCHELL: Population Change and External Commuting in Canada's Rural and Small Town Municipalities: 1996-2001. This paper examines the relationship between population change and external commuting within eight size classes that comprise Canada's rural and small town (RST) municipalities. It finds that population change between 1996 and 2001 has varied much within these classes, with very small (less than 499 residents) and very large (more than 7500) census subdivisions gaining residents at the expense of those that are mid-sized. It also reveals considerable variation in levels of external commuting taking place within these size categories. Larger population size classes demonstrate a much higher percentage of external commuting than do those supported by fewer residents. A comparison of population change and commuting to larger urban areas reveals a weak, but statistically significant, correlation in ali but three of Canada's southern provinces, and in all but the very large and very small population size classes. Other types of migration (in-and out) are assumed to be responsible for this insignificance, although verification of this awaits further study. Resumes C.J.A. MITCHELL: [Population Change and External Commuting in Canada's Rural and Small Town Municipalities: 1996-2001.] > Au cours des 25 dernieres annees, un nombre croissant de geographes ont explore la dynamique du mouvement de la population dans les municipalites les plus petites du Canada. Le present travail contribue a la documentation de ce phenomene en examinant la relation entre le mouvement de la population et la migration de l'exterieur [c.-a-d. vers une grande region metropolitaine de recensement (RMR) ou agglomeration de recensement (AR)] dans huit tranches de tailles qui englobent les municipalites des regions rurales et des petites villes du Canada. Quatre objectifs sont traites. Le premier consiste a decrire le mouvement de la population dans les municipalites des regions rurales et des petites villes du Canada de 1971 a 2001. Le deuxieme objectif consiste a grouper les plus petites municipalites du Canada dans l'une de quatre categories comparatives de mouvement de la population (hausse moderee, moderee, elevee). Le troisieme objectif consiste a reperer les niveaux de migration de l'exterieur dans chacune de ces categories. L'objectif final consiste a evaluer la correlation entre la migration de l'exterieur et le mouvement de la population pour la periode de 1996 a 2001. Une analyse des donnees de Statistique Canada confirme qu'une de population constituait la norme pour de nombreuses subdivisions de recensement (SDR) se trouvant en dehors des grands centres urbains, de 1971 a 2001. Toutefois, en depit de cette tendance generale, une analyse plus approfondie de la periode de 1996 a 2001 revele qu'un grand nombre des plus petites et des plus grandes municipalites des regions rurales et des petites villes se sont agrandies, aux depens de celles de taille moyenne. De plus, dans quatre territoires (Alberta, Ontario, Manitoba et Nunavut), de nombreuses municipalites (souvent autochtones) ont affiche des niveaux impressionnants de croissance durant cette periode quinquennale. Les variations spatiales dans le mouvement de population comparatif sont egalement indiquees pour la periode de 1996 a 2001. L'etude permet de constater que tres peu de municipalites rurales dans l'Est du Canada ont connu le meme niveau de croissance de leur population que d'autres endroits de taille similaire au pays. En fait, un territoire (Terre-Neuve et Labrador), compte non seulement peu de municipalites a hausse elevee, mais aussi le plus grand taux de municipalites a perte elevee. Par contre, le Nunavut et l'Alberta se distinguent par leur taux relativement eleve de regions rurales et de petites villes connaissant une croissance rapide. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it