MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2757204601 · doi:10.1177/0037549717730898

Validating numerical solution of transient Darcy flow using the stabilized mixed finite element method

2017· article· en· W2757204601 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIMULATION · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGhulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and TechnologyConcordia UniversityMcMaster University
KeywordsDarcy's lawDiscretizationMechanicsPorous mediumFinite element methodGalerkin methodPermeability (electromagnetism)Transient (computer programming)MathematicsMathematical analysisGeologyGeotechnical engineeringPorosityComputer sciencePhysicsThermodynamicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The natural flows through porous media often exhibit transient behavior. Some of the examples include water movement in aquifers, oil flow in reservoirs and blood passing through arteries walls. For accurate modeling of such flows, the Darcy model is used with an additional time-dependent pressure term. In this paper, validation of the three-dimensional numerical solution of transient Darcy flow using the stabilized mixed finite element method is presented. The proposed numerical solution employs the implicit backward difference method for the discretization of time, whereas, for space discretization, the Galerkin technique is used. The model is validated against analytical models including the Theis equation for pressure drawdown near a pumping well. The proposed solution is tested for different values of the viscosity of the fluid, and the permeability and specific storage of the medium. The error analysis shows that the stabilized mixed Galerkin methods give stable solutions with no oscillations and spurious results. It is also found that the viscosity of the fluid and the permeability of the medium have prominent effects on the transient behavior of Darcy flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it