MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2757486181

Characterization of the Non-Darkening Gene in a Cranberry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Background

2017· dissertation· en· W2757486181 on OpenAlexfundno aff
D. R. Robson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsPhaseolusBiologyGeneBotanyHorticultureGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) market classes, including cranberry bean, demonstrate seed coat post-harvest darkening (PHD). PHD is associated with poor quality, lowering the overall value of the bean. A candidate MYB was sequenced in darkening (RD) and non-darkening (ND) cranberry bean lines to determine any differences between them. The RD and ND lines were identical for the candidate MYB. An F2 population of a cross between Etna (RD) and Witrood (ND) was created to study the inheritance of the PHD trait and identify its genomic location. The F2 lines were genotyped using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers and used to develop a linkage map with 11 linkage groups. Multiple QTL Mapping (MQM) identified two QTL associated with colour parameter values on chromosome 10. SNP markers identified with the ND loci may be used in the future for marker assisted selection to develop ND cultivars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207