The Development of Open University New Generation Learning Model Using Research and Development for Atomic Physics Course PEFI4421
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research was aimed at developing printed teaching materials of Atomic Physics PEFI4421 Course usingResearch and Development (R & D) model; which consisted of three major set of activities. The first set consisted ofseven stages, the second set consisted of one stage, and the third set consisted of seven stages. This research studywas scheduled at the first year of the course development. This study concluded that (1) the teaching materials usedfor Atomic Physics Course PEFI4421 were necessary to be revised and updated since many of the materials wereoutdated, (2) the materials and concepts of Atomic Physics were hard to be learned by the students independentlywithout face-to-face tutorials, (3) the exercises used in the handout were not clearly described in detail making themto be difficult to be completed, and (4) the physical presentation of the course materials needed improvementbecause they are lack of attractiveness for the students to use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it