MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2757657277 · doi:10.7202/1039314ar

Germain Lemieux par lui-même (1914-1958)

2017· article· fr· W2757657277 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean-Pierre Pichette

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers Charlevoix Études franco-ontariennes · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité Sainte-Anne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jean-Pierre Pichette publie la première tranche de l’entrevue qu’il a réalisée en 1995 auprès du fondateur de l’ethnologie franco-ontarienne. Ce long entretien consacré à la vie et à l’oeuvre du jésuite Germain Lemieux (1914-2008) a d’abord été diffusé sur les ondes de la radio d’État. Préparé de longue main, sur la base de la fréquentation continue des écrits et de l’homme, il a été enregistré sous la forme d’un autoportrait afin de permettre au père Lemieux de situer dans leur contexte les travaux de sa production scientifique et d’aller au-delà des écrits en livrant ses souvenirs et ses projets. Ce premier volet, qui couvre les années 1914-1958, aborde sous un jour personnel la période gaspésienne de ce chercheur – son enfance à Cap-Chat et ses études au séminaire de Gaspé –, puis son entrée et sa formation chez les jésuites de Montréal, jusqu’au début de sa période franco-ontarienne – son affectation au collège du Sacré-Coeur de Sudbury et ses premières enquêtes dans le nord de l’Ontario. Présentés dans leur chronologie, ces témoignages apportent un éclairage nouveau sur les origines paysannes de ce personnage marquant, sur sa formation, sur son tempérament et finalement sur son oeuvre dont ils révèlent les détours inédits. Cette édition est accompagnée de notes et de commentaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers Charlevoix Études franco-ontariennesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207