MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2757741084 · doi:10.3138/jammi.2.1.012

A case of group G streptococcal endocarditis masquerading as acute rheumatic fever

2017· article· en· W2757741084 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Maureen Cameron, Dianne Mosher, Julie Carson, Andrew Maitland, John Conly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health ServicesQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInfective endocarditisEndocarditisRheumatic feverMedicinePolyarthritisGroup AViridans streptococciStreptolysinStreptococcusHeart murmurGroup BAcute rheumatic feverInternal medicineArthritisBiologyBacterial protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cases of infective endocarditis attributable to group G streptococci are uncommon, but may be more virulent and aggressive than viridans group streptococci. This case report documents an unusual presentation of group G streptococcal endocarditis in a previously healthy young man whose initial symptoms and signs of fever, migratory polyarthritis, subcutaneous nodule, new systolic murmur, polyarthralgias, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) in the presence of a markedly elevated anti-streptolysin O titre fulfilled three major clinical and three minor criteria of the Revised Jones criteria, leading to an initial working diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever before echocardiography. Clinicians need to be reminded of the masquerading features of infective endocarditis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease CanadaSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207