Subtypes of functional brain connectivity as early markers of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Highlights Reliable functional brain network subtypes accompany cognitive impairment in AD Symptom-related subtypes exist in the default-mode, limbic and salience networks A limbic subtype is associated with a familial risk of AD in healthy older adults Limbic subtypes also associate with beta amyloid deposition and ApoE4 In Brief We found reliable subtypes of functional brain connectivity networks in older adults, associated with AD-related clinical symptoms in patients as well as several AD risk factors/biomarkers in asymptomatic individuals. Summary The heterogeneity of brain degeneration has not been investigated yet for functional brain network connectivity, a promising biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease. We coupled cluster analysis with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging to discover connectivity subtypes in healthy older adults and patients with cognitive disorders related to Alzheimer’s disease, noting associations between subtypes and cognitive symptoms in the default-mode, limbic and salience networks. In an independent asymptomatic cohort with a family history of Alzheimer’s dementia, the connectivity subtypes had good test-retest reliability across all tested networks. We found that a limbic subtype was overrepresented in these individuals, which was previously associated with symptoms. Other limbic subtypes showed associations with cerebrospinal fluid Aβ 1-42 levels and ApoE4 genotype. Our results demonstrate the existence of reliable subtypes of functional brain networks in older adults and support future investigations in limbic connectivity subtypes as early biomarkers of Alzheimer’s degeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".