MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2757777593 · doi:10.7298/x4b56gqk

Tools For Modeling Sparse Vector Autoregressions

2016· article· en· W2757777593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeCommons (Cornell University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInnovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaAmazon Web ServicesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Proposed VARX-L Penalty Functions.Note that ( ) on and ( ) off denote the diagonal and off-diagonal elements of coefficient matrix ( ) , respectively. . . .1.2 One-step and four-step ahead MSFE of k = 20 macroeconomic indicators (relative to sample mean) with m = 20 exogenous predictors p = 4, s = 4. . . . . . .1.3 One-step ahead and four-step ahead MSFE (relative to sample mean) for VARX forecasts of k = 4 Canadian macroeconomic indicators with m = 20 exogenous predictors p = 4, s = 4 and VAR forecasts of 4 Canadian macroeconomic indicators, p = 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.4 One-step and four-step ahead MSFE (relative to a random walk) for k = 20 nonstationary macroeconomic indicators with m=20 exogenous predictors which shrink toward a vector random walk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.5 Out of sample MSFE of one-step ahead forecasts after 100 simulations: Scenario 1.Standard errors are shown in parentheses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.6 Out of sample MSFE of one-step ahead forecasts after 100 simulations: Scenario 2. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.7 Out of sample MSFE of one-step ahead forecasts after 100 simulations: Scenario 3. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.8 Out of sample MSFE of one-step ahead forecasts after 100 simulations: Scenario 4. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.1 Out-of-sample mean-squared one-step-ahead forecast error (standard errors are in parentheses) for Scenario 1 based on 100 simulations. . . . . . . . . . . . .2.2 Out-of-sample mean-squared one-step-ahead forecast error (standard errors are in parentheses) for Scenario 2 based on 100 simulations. . . . . . . . . . . . .2.3 Out-of-sample mean-squared one-step-ahead forecast error (standard errors are in parentheses) for Scenario 3 based on 100 simulations. . . . . . . . . . . . .2.4 Lag selection performance (standard errors in parentheses) for Scenario 1 based on 100 simulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.5 Lag selection performance (standard errors in parentheses) for Scenario 2 based on 100 simulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it