MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758080701 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2017.8050596

Multichannel color image watermark detection utilizing vector-based hidden Markov model

2017· article· en· W2758080701 on OpenAlexaff
Marzieh Amini, Hamidreza Sadreazami, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatermarkDigital watermarkingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionRGB color modelDetectorGrayscaleColor imageWaveletChannel (broadcasting)Pattern recognition (psychology)PixelImage (mathematics)Image processingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimedia data piracy in the Internet is a growing problem, since it provides easy and fast data transmission. Watermarking is regarded as a solution to restrain unauthorized duplication or distribution data. Image watermarking research mostly focuses on grayscale images with an extension to color images. However, most of these techniques ignore dependencies between color channels. In view of this, in this work, a multichannel color image watermarking technique and its corresponding detector in the wavelet domain is proposed. The inter-channel dependencies between RGB channels and inter-scale dependencies of the wavelet coefficients of color image are taken into account by employing the vector-based hidden Markov model. We conduct experiment on a set of color images to assess the performance of the proposed watermark detector. The results show that the performance of the proposed detector is superior to that of the other detectors in terms of the imperceptibility of the embedded watermark and the detection rate. It is also shown that the proposed detector has better performance in presence or absence of different kinds of attacks in comparison to the other existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207