MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758242241 · doi:10.5209/ciyc.55970

Tecnología e identidad: el caso de los inuit y Facebook

2017· article· es· W2758242241 on OpenAlex
Alexander Castleton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCIC Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the relationship between technology, cultural identity, and social change in the Canadian Arctic. Using an ethnographic strategy based on interviews and digital content observation, I explore how a group of students from the Arctic College located in the community of Iqaluit located on Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic, use the social networking site Facebook. I found that, in addition to an expected use of the social network associated with the script of the technology, Inuit youth use Facebook to access content related to their identity, discuss cultural issues, and recall traditions. This article argues that the Inuit identity is an example of how indigenous cultures have to be understood as something dynamic and in constant change for which ICTs are fundamental. Inuit identity includes artifacts such as computers, the Internet or Facebook for the affirmation and practice of their culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it