MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758550728 · doi:10.1111/eva.12559

Assessing the potential of genotyping‐by‐sequencing‐derived single nucleotide polymorphisms to identify the geographic origins of intercepted gypsy moth (<i>Lymantria dispar</i>) specimens: A proof‐of‐concept study

2017· article· en· W2758550728 on OpenAlex
Sandrine Picq, Melody A. Keena, Nathan P. Havill, Don Stewart, Esther Pouliot, Brian Boyle, Roger C. Lévesque, Richard C. Hamelin, Michel Cusson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEvolutionary Applications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité LavalNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLymantria disparGypsy mothSubspeciesBiologyBiological dispersalPopulationEcologyRange (aeronautics)IntrogressionGenotypingPopulation geneticsIntroduced speciesZoologyEvolutionary biologyLepidoptera genitaliaGeneticsGenotypeDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Forest invasive alien species are a major threat to ecosystem stability and can have enormous economic and social impacts. For this reason, preventing the introduction of Asian gypsy moths ( AGM ; Lymantria dispar asiatica and L. d. japonica ) into North America has been identified as a top priority by North American authorities. The AGM is an important defoliator of a wide variety of hardwood and coniferous trees, displaying a much broader host range and an enhanced dispersal ability relative to the already established European gypsy moth ( L. d. dispar ). Although molecular assays have been developed to help distinguish gypsy moth subspecies, these tools are not adequate for tracing the geographic origins of AGM samples intercepted on foreign vessels. Yet, this type of information would be very useful in characterizing introduction pathways and would help North American regulatory authorities in preventing introductions. The present proof‐of‐concept study assessed the potential of single nucleotide polymorphism ( SNP ) markers, obtained through genotyping by sequencing ( GBS ), to identify the geographic origins of gypsy moth samples. The approach was applied to eight laboratory‐reared gypsy moth populations, whose original stocks came from locations distributed over the entire range of L. dispar , comprising representatives of the three recognized subspecies. The various analyses we performed showed strong differentiation among populations ( F ST ≥ 0.237), enabling clear distinction of subspecies and geographic variants, while revealing introgression near the geographic boundaries between subspecies. This strong population structure resulted in 100% assignment success of moths to their original population when 2,327 SNP s were used. Although the SNP panels we developed are not immediately applicable to contemporary, natural populations because of distorted allele frequencies in the laboratory‐reared populations we used, our results attest to the potential of genomewide SNP markers as a tool to identify the geographic origins of intercepted gypsy moth samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it