MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758594803 · doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2005.08.193

Evaluation of Cerebral Oxygenation During Electrophysiological Studies

2005· article· en· W2758594803 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth M. McNeill, R. Gagnon, James E. Potts, Charles R. Kerr, J. Yeung Wai-Lah, Shubhayan Sanatani

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineAblationOxygenationTachycardiaElectrophysiologyCytochrome c oxidaseAnesthesiaNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To assess cerebral cortical oxygenation and cellular homeostasis during EPS and RF ablation, using near infrared spectroscopy. Standard EPS was performed in 11 sedated patients (female = 6, mean age = 45 ± 11 years) with symptomatic SVT documented on ECG and no pre-existing cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. A NIRO-300 spectrophotometer was used to continuously measure absolute changes in the concentrations of chromophores which reflect intravascular and mitochondrial levels of oxygenation, namely oxygenated haemoglobin (hbo2), deoxygenated haemoglobin (Hb) and the net redox status of cytochrome c oxidase (cyt-a,a3). MABP was monitored simultaneously. RF ablations were performed on 10 patients [AV nodal reentrant tachycardia=6; AV reentrant tachycardia= 4; cycle length = 348 ± 69 msec (range: 225-425 msec)]. No significant changes occurred in hbo2, Hb and cyt-a,a3 during atrial and ventricular EPS pacing protocols, induced SVT, or RF ablation. MABP decreased during pacing at cycle lengths < 400 msec (p<0.005). Cellular energy dynamics were stable during atrial and ventricular pacing, SVT, and RF ablation. This data suggests that overall cerebral tissue oxygenation is preserved during EPS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207