MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758721813 · doi:10.5114/aic.2017.70199

Assessment of cognitive functions and quality of life in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study

2017· article· en· W2758721813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katarzyna Olszewska, Tomasz Tokarek, Barbara Bętkowska-Korpała, Artur Dziewierz, Paweł Kleczyński, Danuta Sorysz, Dariusz Dudek

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Interventional Cardiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)CognitionAortic valveInternal medicineCardiologyPsychiatryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Olszewska K, Tokarek T, Bętkowska-Korpała B, et al. Assessment of cognitive functions and quality of life in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2017;13(3):258-262. doi:10.5114/aic.2017.70199. APA Olszewska, K., Tokarek, T., Bętkowska-Korpała, B., Dziewierz, A., Kleczyński, P., & Sorysz, D. et al. (2017). Assessment of cognitive functions and quality of life in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 13(3), 258-262. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2017.70199 Chicago Olszewska, Katarzyna, Tomasz Tokarek, Barbara Bętkowska-Korpała, Artur Dziewierz, Paweł Kleczyński, Danuta Sorysz, and Dariusz Dudek. 2017. "Assessment of cognitive functions and quality of life in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study". Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 13 (3): 258-262. doi:10.5114/aic.2017.70199. Harvard Olszewska, K., Tokarek, T., Bętkowska-Korpała, B., Dziewierz, A., Kleczyński, P., Sorysz, D., and Dudek, D. (2017). Assessment of cognitive functions and quality of life in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 13(3), pp.258-262. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2017.70199 MLA Olszewska, Katarzyna et al. "Assessment of cognitive functions and quality of life in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study." Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017, pp. 258-262. doi:10.5114/aic.2017.70199. Vancouver Olszewska K, Tokarek T, Bętkowska-Korpała B, Dziewierz A, Kleczyński P, Sorysz D et al. Assessment of cognitive functions and quality of life in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2017;13(3):258-262. doi:10.5114/aic.2017.70199.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Interventional CardiologySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207