MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758760487 · doi:10.1109/dsd.2017.22

Optimal Placement of Heterogeneous Uncore Component in 3D Chip-Multiprocessors

2017· article· en· W2758760487 on OpenAlexaff
Aniseh Dorostkar, Arghavan Asad, Mahmood Fathy, Farah Mohammadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Parallel computingComputer scienceParsecComponent (thermodynamics)Energy consumptionMemory architectureChipEmbedded systemEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we present a convex optimization model to design a stacked hybrid memory system contains eDRAM and STT-RAM banks with minimum write energy consumption of STT-RAM memory banks and minimum refresh energy of eDRAM banks with efficient number of TSVs in embedded CMP. Our convex model optimizes numbers and placement of memory banks from different technologies on the memory layer and finding optimal number and optimal placement of TSVs while satisfy maximum Load on TSVs. Experimental results on PARSEC benchmark show that the proposed Architecture improves energy-delay product (EDP) by 51% on average.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207