MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758785972 · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000001390

Bacterial Keratitis in Toronto: A 16-Year Review of the Microorganisms Isolated and the Resistance Patterns Observed

2017· review· en· W2758785972 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCornea · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobiologyPiperacillinVancomycinBiologyCeftazidimePseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusAntibioticsKeratitisAntibiotic resistanceErythromycinBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To review the incidence, distribution, current trends, and resistance patterns of bacterial keratitis isolates in Toronto over the past 16 years. METHODS: Microbiology records of suspected bacterial keratitis that underwent a diagnostic corneal scraping and cultures from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. The distribution of the main isolated pathogens and in vitro laboratory minimum inhibitory concentration testing results were used to identify resistance patterns. RESULTS: A total of 2330 corneal scrapings were taken over 16 years. A pathogen was recovered in 1335 samples (57.3%), with bacterial keratitis accounting for 1189 of the positive cultures (86.0% of all isolates). The total number of gram-positive and gram-negative isolates was 963 and 324, respectively. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria isolates, respectively. A decreasing trend in the number of isolates in gram-positive bacteria (P = 0.01), specifically among Staphylococcus aureus (P < 0.0001) and Streptococcus species (P = 0.005), was identified. When analyzing the susceptibilities of gram-positive and gram-negative isolates, an increasing trend in antibiotic resistance was observed in erythromycin (P = 0.018), ceftazidime (P = 0.046), and piperacillin/tazobactam (P = 0.005). The susceptibility of tested gram-positive microorganisms to vancomycin was 99.6%. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a decreasing trend in the number of isolates in gram-positive microorganisms over the past 16 years. An increasing trend in resistance for various antibiotics against gram-negative and gram-positive isolates was identified. High susceptibility to vancomycin reinforced the empirical use of fortified tobramycin and vancomycin in the initial management of severe bacterial keratitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it