Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueWORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · 2018
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesNarodowe Centrum Badań i RozwojuArgonne National LaboratoryComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronAustralian Research CouncilCanadian Space AgencyIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareState Committee of ScienceMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroUniversity of SydneyMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaMinistère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la RechercheHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBergens ForskningsstiftelseFondazione CariploBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación ProductivaMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyRegione LombardiaComisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Gobierno de ArgentinaCentro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico IndustrialLeverhulme TrustEuropean CommissionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUniversity of AdelaideNational Research FoundationJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungUniversity of New South WalesNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Sydney UniversityBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyRoyal Swedish Academy of SciencesMinisterio de Educación, Gobierno de ChileMonash UniversityIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaGeorgia Institute of TechnologyConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasDurham UniversityVetenskapsrådetSmithsonian InstitutionBarnard CollegeUniversity of OxfordInstitute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of TokyoUniversity of LeicesterWisconsin Alumni Research FoundationAgence Nationale de la RechercheSveučilište u ZagrebuSveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u OsijekuIowa State UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTelescopeCherenkov Telescope ArrayCherenkov radiationPrimary mirrorGamma-ray astronomy
Abstract
A set of telescope arrays will be built to observe gamma rays
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations226
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes