MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758959175 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2017.8050990

Patch-based salient region detection using statistical modeling in the non-subsampled contourlet domain

2017· article· en· W2758959175 on OpenAlexaff
M. Rezaie Abkenar, Hamidreza Sadreazami, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContourletArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)SalientComputer scienceFeature extractionFeature (linguistics)Entropy (arrow of time)Computer visionWavelet transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A salient region is part of the image that captures the greatest attention by the human visual system. In this paper, we propose a novel salient region detection technique in the non-subsampled contourlet domain. The image is first decomposed into non-overlapping patches in order to fully exploit the repetitive patterns in the image. It is known that the non-subsampled contourlet transform provides an efficient multi-resolution, multi-directional, localized and shift invariant decomposition of images. In view of this, by using the statistical properties of non-subsampled contourlet coefficients of image patches, a set of feature descriptors are extracted to construct the feature map for each color channel. An entropy-based criterion is proposed to combine the channel feature maps into a saliency map. Simulations are conducted on a dataset of natural images to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and to compare it with that of the other existing methods. The results show that the proposed salient region detection method provides higher precision, recall, and F-measure and lower mean absolute error values as compared to the other existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionFrench-language works237,207