MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2759031444 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v10n10p106

Is Excess Bank Liquidity within the West African Economic and Monetary Union Explained by Regulations?

2017· article· en· W2759031444 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed Lamine Mbengue, Mamadou Abdoulaye Konté

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarket liquidityPublicationObligationInterest rateMonetary economicsEconomicsPanel dataEconomic and monetary unionFinancial systemBusinessCapital (architecture)Government (linguistics)International economicsEuropean unionGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For about fifteen years, the banking system of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) has been characterized by excess liquidity. In this paper, we analyze the explaining factors of excess liquidity by considering regulations as key variables and a dynamic Panel Model is used on aggregate banking data covering the period from 1990 to 2013 for the methodology. Results show the following explaining factors: government’s deposits, credit granted to public companies and to central administration, the entry into force of the single agreement act, the act on financial relationships with foreign countries, and on the suppression of usurious transactions and interest rates, the obligation to publish the whole effective rate and the redefinition of new minima caps in terms of share capital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business Research→Same topicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency→French-language works237,207→