MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759076084 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2017.2710349

Direction of Arrival Estimation of Acoustic Echoes Using Source Elimination Method

2017· article· en· W2759076084 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Marc-André Guérard, Dominic Grenier

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNarrowbandDirection of arrivalSmoothingComputer scienceCovariance matrixPower (physics)SIGNAL (programming language)AlgorithmMultiple signal classificationAcousticsNoise (video)Monte Carlo methodSpeech recognitionMathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsPhysicsAntenna (radio)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for the direction of arrival (DOA) estimation for a single narrowband acoustic source with multiple low power echoes is proposed. The mathematical relations between the signal covariance matrix, the sources steering vectors, and the power of the sources are developed in order to expose the contribution of each source. Algorithms to find each of the source's DOA and their respective power are presented. The source elimination method (SEM), based on the elimination of the contribution of each source to improve the DOA estimation, is developed. Monte Carlo simulations are presented, showing that SEM yields more accurate results than multiple signal classification (MUSIC) with forward-backward spatial smoothing (FBSS) to find the echoes' DOA with an echo-to-noise ratio between -13 and -17 dB. Experimental results show that for a small array and two sources with different power, SEM outperforms MUSIC with FBSS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207