Vitamin B12 deficiency in inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective observational pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnostic and management guidelines for vitamin B12 (cobalamin, Cbl) deficiency in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are lacking. True deficiency is defined as Cbl concentrations below reference range combined with elevated methylmalonic acid (MMA) concentrations. Studies analyzing Cbl status in IBD use only Cbl concentrations without confirmatory MMA. This study aims to determine the proportion of IBD patients with Cbl concentrations below reference range and their predisposing clinical and genetic characteristics. We then compared this to the proportion with true deficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective observational pilot study of adult IBD outpatients, Cbl concentrations, MMA levels, and fucosyltransferase 2 mutations were measured at clinic visits. RESULTS: A total of 66 Crohn's disease (CD) and 30 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients were recruited. Mean Cbl concentrations (pmol/l) in CD (253.7) were not significantly lower than UC (320.5, P=0.24). Serum Cbl below reference range (<148) was observed in 7.6 and 10% of CD and UC patients, respectively (P=0.70). True deficiency in CD and UC was 3 and 3.3%, respectively (P=1.0). Patients with ileal resections more than 30 cm had lower mean Cbl concentrations (177, P=0.02) and a trend toward higher proportions with Cbl levels below reference range (40%, P=0.06), but not increased deficiency rates (0%, P=1.0). Disease location, severity, and fucosyltransferase 2 mutations were not associated with altered Cbl status. CONCLUSION: True Cbl deficiency was rare in IBD patients in this study. A disparity in Cbl status exists when confirmatory MMA levels are used compared with Cbl concentrations alone. Asymptomatic IBD patients with low serum Cbl require confirmatory tests to guide management and avoid unnecessary treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".