MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759160924 · doi:10.1117/12.606203

Prediction of the removal profile for tools having a finite contact patch

2005· article· en· W2759160924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christophe Bouvier, S. J. Burns, Sheryl M. Gracewski, Edward Fess

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Surface Polishing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolishingRotational symmetryPosition (finance)Mechanical engineeringMaterials scienceFinite element methodPosition errorOpticsComputer scienceEngineering drawingEngineeringStructural engineeringGeometryMathematicsPhysicsOrientation (vector space)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new generation of compliant tools and processes called UltraForm Finishing is under development at the Center for Optics Manufacturing (COM) and OptiPro Systems (Ontario, NY). The purpose is to achieve rapid, high quality finishing of hard materials. These compliant tools exhibit a large contact patch that can be up to 1 cm wide. A numerical model was developed to account for finite contact patch geometry on removal for a flat rotating axisymmetric workpiece. This model was used to determine the depth of removal as a function of radial position after the polishing tool has completely traversed the workpiece from its center to a given radial position. The depth of removal was investigated for circular and oval contact patches and a variety of removal functions. A constant removal depth is desired to minimize the induced figure error. Predicted results were compared to experimental measurements of induced figure error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Surface Polishing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207