Intrinsic Viscosity of Cyclic Polystyrene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intrinsic viscosity of cyclic polystyrenes (C-PS) and linear polystyrenes (L-PS) with molecular weight (MW) ranging from 16K to 370K was measured in THF using size exclusion chromatography coupled with a triple detection system. The C-PS samples were prepared by a ring-closure reaction of telechelic linear precursor synthesized by anionic polymerization. As-synthesized C-PS samples after the ring-closure reaction contain various byproducts, and they were fractionated by liquid chromatography at the critical condition to obtain highly pure C-PS. While the intrinsic viscosity of L-PS agrees well with the literature data, C-PS shows significantly lower value than the literature values. The Mark–Houwink exponent of C-PS is 0.67, somewhat lower than 0.70 for L-PS in the good solvent over the MW range examined. Therefore, the ratio of the intrinsic viscosity of C-PS to L-PS ( g ′ = [η] C /[η] L ) in THF is not MW independent but decreases as MW increases (0.63 ≥ [η] C /[η] L ≥ 0.57). The trend of intrinsic viscosity agrees well with the computer simulation result. The discrepancy in [η] C from the literature values can largely be attributed to the contamination of linear byproducts in the earlier studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".