MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759373267 · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2756872

Data Mining and Analytics in the Process Industry: The Role of Machine Learning

2017· article· en· W2759373267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsAnalyticsComputer scienceProcess (computing)Data scienceData analysisMachine learningKnowledge extractionSoftware analyticsProcess miningArtificial intelligenceLearning analyticsBig dataUnsupervised learningData miningWork in processEngineeringBusiness processBusiness process modelingSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data mining and analytics have played an important role in knowledge discovery and decision making/supports in the process industry over the past several decades. As a computational engine to data mining and analytics, machine learning serves as basic tools for information extraction, data pattern recognition and predictions. From the perspective of machine learning, this paper provides a review on existing data mining and analytics applications in the process industry over the past several decades. The state-of-the-art of data mining and analytics are reviewed through eight unsupervised learning and ten supervised learning algorithms, as well as the application status of semi-supervised learning algorithms. Several perspectives are highlighted and discussed for future researches on data mining and analytics in the process industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it