Bibliographic record
Abstract
C.R.A.Z.Y. By Robert Schwartzwald Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press, 2015, 178 pp.REVIEWED BY ANDRE LOISELLEJean-Marc Vallees C.R.A.Z.Y. is a bittersweet coming-of-age story about a gay character named Zac (Marc-Andre Grondin), who struggles throughout his childhood, adolescence and early adulthood to find his place among his eccentrically conventional family and earn the respect of his charming, but shamelessly homophobic father, Gervais (Michel Cote). The film was the biggest critical and commercial success of 2005 in Quebec and, over a decade after its release, it remains among the ten top-grossing movies ever made in the province. As such, C.R.A.Z.Y. is unquestionably deserving of a book-length study; and Robert Schwartzwalds contribution to the Queer Film Classics series, edited by Matt Hays and Tom Waugh for Arsenal Pulp Press, certainly delivers an eloquent, informative and insightful examination of the film. As would be expected of a single-film monograph like this one, Schwartzwald s short volume provides a detailed account of the films production history (26-39), a nuanced reading of its intricate narrative structure (44-50), sophisticated visual composition (50-62) and evocative musical score (77-93), as well as a discussion of the broader Quebecois (63-74) and gay (117-131) cultural contexts within which the film operates. Moreover, Schwartzwald does a good job of accounting for some of the linguistic subtleties that might be lost in translation for an Anglophone spectatorship. For instance, his accurate interpretation of the expression tu men feras pas un fifi (113) goes a long way to demonstrate the manner in which Vallee and his co-author, Francois Boulay, use every-day French Canadian idioms to construct a complex and multi-layered scriptBut what comes as a most pleasant surprise is Schwartzwald s unexpected critique of C.R.A.Z.Y.'s putative status as a classic. C.R.A.Z.Y.s queemess is especially dubious in terms of its happy ending, which shows a saccharine reconciliation between Zac and Gervais who, even in his old age, still refuses to discuss his now middle-aged son's sexual orientation. As Schwartzwald pointedly asks:Is it problematic, then, to speak of C.R.A.Z.Y. as a queer film? Certainly, if by queer we mean a work that has at its core the refusal to stabilize categories of gender or sexuality. C.R.A.Z.Y. is quite orthodox throughout in its representation of sexual difference as a chance occurrence, but all the same innate and incontrovertible [...] Nor is C.R.A.Z.Y. queer, if by that we would mean that it critically explores the fluid ways in which sexual practices and identities are alternately included or excluded from what Gayle Rubin calls the charmed circle of social legitimacy [... ] In the narrator Zac, the film has arguably produced the sexually non-threatening and ultimately deferential gay citizen who has won his position inside the charmed circle of the early twenty-first century. (136-137,138-139).It is refreshing to read a book that does not simply assume the undisputable merit of its subject-matter only because it happens to have been deemed worthy of inclusion in a classics series.Highly manipulative in its calculated insertions of beloved oldies and classic rock favorites on the soundtrack, deliberate references to the quaintness of 1960s Quebec, and unapologetic reliance on melodramatic cliches, such as maternal sacrifice, unrequited love and violent sibling rivalry, C.R.A.Z.Y. comes across as a skillfully-crafted mainstream film that never aims to shock or disturb its audience. As Schwartzwald suggests, its gay content could easily be dismissed as just a trendy variation on the conventional sexual-awakening trope of the coming-of-age narrative. But ultimately, the author chooses to redeem C.R.A.Z.Y and claim that, in spite of its penchant for homonormativity, it remains a valid film from the perspective of queer spectatorship. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".