Possibilidades e limites das práticas de monitoramento e avaliação em municípios acima de 50 mil habitantes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo do estudo foi verificar a percepção dos dirigentes das Secretarias Municipais quanto às práticas e processos do monitoramento e avaliação no âmbito da gestão governamental. Metodologia: Foi aplicado questionário a dirigentes governamentais (secretários ou técnicos) de municípios com mais de 50 mil habitantes e que aderiram ao Pacto ela Saúde, obtendo-se 89 municípios. Resultados: Em que pese a maioria dos respondentes possuir os instrumentos de gestão e, fazer uso de sistemas de informação para subsidiar a tomada de decisão, podem ser consideradas como inadequadas ou insuficientes. Conclusão: Considerando-se as necessidades institucionais e os desafios a serem superados, é preciso fortalecer a organização de práticas que possibilitem a institucionalização do M&A no âmbito da gestão municipal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".