MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759493265 · doi:10.17566/ciads.v6i3.403

Possibilidades e limites das práticas de monitoramento e avaliação em municípios acima de 50 mil habitantes

2017· article· pt· W2759493265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O objetivo do estudo foi verificar a percepção dos dirigentes das Secretarias Municipais quanto às práticas e processos do monitoramento e avaliação no âmbito da gestão governamental. Metodologia: Foi aplicado questionário a dirigentes governamentais (secretários ou técnicos) de municípios com mais de 50 mil habitantes e que aderiram ao Pacto ela Saúde, obtendo-se 89 municípios. Resultados: Em que pese a maioria dos respondentes possuir os instrumentos de gestão e, fazer uso de sistemas de informação para subsidiar a tomada de decisão, podem ser consideradas como inadequadas ou insuficientes. Conclusão: Considerando-se as necessidades institucionais e os desafios a serem superados, é preciso fortalecer a organização de práticas que possibilitem a institucionalização do M&A no âmbito da gestão municipal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it