MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759656850 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4323.3.2

A taxonomic review of the genus Acanella (Cnidaria: Octocorallia: Isididae) in the North Atlantic Ocean, with descriptions of two new species

2017· review· en· W2759656850 on OpenAlexfundno aff
ESPRIT HEESTAND SAUCIER, Auzita Sajjadi, Scott C. France

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleFisheries and Oceans CanadaInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement
KeywordsBiologyOctocoralliaCnidariaGenusRange (aeronautics)Context (archaeology)Species distributionZoologyEcologyCoelenterataCoralHabitatPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deep-sea bamboo coral genus Acanella has a cosmopolitan distribution, is found on hard and soft substrata between 300 and 2875 meters depth, and may be abundant where present. The genus has been the source of taxonomic debate almost since its initial description, and species in the North Atlantic have proven difficult to identify. We examined 145 Acanella colonies collected from across a broad geographic distribution to address morphological variation in the context of genetic differences, focusing on the North Atlantic species, but with a comparison to four Pacific species. We generated DNA sequences for mitochondrial mtMutS and nuclear 18S from ninety-seven Acanella specimens. After combining data from both gene regions, eight concatenated sequences were identified (A–H), six of which are associated with nominal species, while the other two come from taxa that do not match any known species description. The most common sequence (A) is associated with specimens identified as Acanella arbuscula, A. eburnea, and Isidella elongata. We find that morphological characteristics used to differentiate these species are distributed along an intraspecific continuum and that alternate morphologies of A. arbuscula have been identified in collections as different species, with the identity influenced by sampling location. We synonymize A. eburnea with A. arbuscula and discuss confusion with I. elongata. The geographic range of A. arbuscula is expanded. We propose the resurrection of the Mediterranean species A. furcata and describe two new species, A. aurelia sp. nov. and A. scarletae sp. nov. New geographic records and the first SEM images of the Pacific species A. chiliensis, A. rigida, and A. robusta, all described prior to 1907, are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesFrench-language works237,207