The effects of kinesio tape of the upper trapezius muscle on the musculoskeletal disorders of upper quarter region (literature review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
abstract Background: we undertook a literature review to produce evidence-based recommendation for the kinesio tape of upper trapezius muscle in the musculoskeletal disorders of upper quarter region. Data source: a full literature electronic search was performed using google scholar ,pubmed, science direct, proquest, medline, advanced google and pedro database. The following keywords were used: trapezius muscle, upper trapezius muscle, clinical taping. kinesio tape, elastic tape. physio tape, musculoskeletal disorders, upper quarter region. Study selection: criteria that were used by researcher included the English papers that had been published from 2000 to 2013. Data extraction: We found 35 articles through database searching, 15 articles, potentially relevant papers retrieved for evaluation of full text .generaiiy studies put into 4 categories on the based of the application of kinesio tape. Data synthesis: Although upper trapezius taping seems to reduce pain in short term and improve function in people with pain and movement disorder during activities of daily living, strong evidence to identify the underlying mechanisms is still not available
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".